Navigating Support from Home – Understanding Care Recipient Contributions Under Support at Home

Business Strategies
Practical guidance for software developers and providers to build compliant, user-friendly payment solutions for aged care.
Written by Pete Williams, CTO Tyro Health at Tyro Payments
In part 1 of this article series, we explored the challenges and complexities of managing care recipient contributions under the Support at Home program, from variable rates and direct billing to tracking lifetime caps and addressing financial hardship. Now, we’ll look how to turn these challenges into actionable solutions. We’ll focus on the essential systems and strategies that will enable aged care providers and software developers to design flexible, compliant, and user-friendly payment solutions.
For software developers and providers assessing system capabilities, an effective solution for managing Support at Home contributions should include the following components:
Intelligent registration and validation
The system must securely capture and validate payment details and recipient preferences. It should:
Flexible payment processing engine
To meet the diverse needs of care recipients, the payment engine should:
Comprehensive reporting suite
Transparent, timely reporting is essential for compliance and smooth operations. A robust reporting solution should deliver:
Turning requirements into reality demands careful planning and execution across key operational areas:
Design care recipient-centric onboarding
Build a streamlined onboarding workflow that:
Implement a comprehensive payment collection workflow
Wherever possible, automate. An effective collection workflow should:
Establish robust change management protocols
Prepare for ongoing change by defining internal processes to:
A flexible payment system can accommodate the unique preferences of each care recipient. Here’s how:
Maria – Prefers convenience
Maria uses automatic credit card payments. She receives a digital notification three days before each scheduled payment and an email confirmation once it’s processed. If a payment fails, the system automatically retries after sending her an SMS with a secure link to update her card details.
Robert – Prefers control
Robert chooses to manually review and approve each payment. After receiving a detailed service breakdown via email, he logs into the provider’s portal to approve the charge. Once approved, he receives a digital receipt.
The system also makes it easy for him to update his banking details when needed.
Helen – Values predictability
Helen prefers direct debit with a monthly cap on automated debits. She receives printed statements by mail, aligning with her preference. For payments that exceed a predefined threshold, she receives a courtesy phone call in advance. She has also nominated her daughter as a financial delegate, giving her portal access to manage payments on Helen’s behalf.
With the deadline approaching, now is the time to act:
1. Assess current systems
Conduct an honest evaluation of whether your existing (or planned) software can support the key requirements: variable rates, direct contribution collection, cap tracking, and multiple payment methods. Identify gaps early.
2. Map payment journeys
Document the end-to-end payment experience from the care recipient’s perspective. Document different pathways—automatic payments, manual approvals, various payment methods—and flag potential pain points.
3. Prioritise payment flexibility
Ensure that your chosen solution supports modern payment capabilities, such as tokenised card payments (i.e., secure “card on file”), resilient direct debit infrastructure, and potential PayTo integration.
4. Develop clear communications
Create a suite of communication templates—letters, emails, portal messages, SMS—to explain contribution obligations, payment options, timelines, data security, and how to get help.
5. Test notification systems
Ensure all automated notifications (e.g., upcoming payments, confirmations, failed payments) are rigorously tested for clarity, accuracy, and timeliness.
6. Implement secure payment management
All processes handling payment data must be PCI-DSS compliant (for card data) and fully aligned with Australian privacy principles. Security cannot be an afterthought.
The transition to provider-managed, variable care recipient contributions under Support at Home isn’t just an administrative shift—it’s a fundamental reworking of financial workflows in aged care.
While the complexity is real, so too is the opportunity. By investing in robust, flexible, and user-centric payment systems now, software developers can create essential tools, and providers can ensure a smoother, more compliant transition.
Success lies in building systems that don’t just meet regulatory requirements—but that also provide care recipients with the security, transparency, and choice they expect. With proactive preparation and strategic technology adoption, this challenge becomes a chance to drive better financial management, stronger operations, and a vastly improved service experience for those receiving care.
To help providers navigate this transition, Tyro Health will seamlessly integrate with this new framework, enabling aged care providers to process Support at Home claims and manage participant contribution payments with ease. If you’re an aged care service provider or software developer interested in learning more about our integrated solution, please register your interest here.
Disclaimers
Tyro Health provides this article for general information and educational purposes and does not take into account the financial situation or need of any reader. The information provided must not be relied upon as legal, tax or financial advice.